Global Recycling Day: Analysing the role of scrap in steelmaking through the years
To mark Global Recycling Day, Matthew Wenban-Smith reflects on the history of steel recycling and what it tells us about the transition to a net-zero steel economy in the future.
When it comes to recycling, it is worth taking the long view. For the first few thousand years, iron and steel recycling meant reworking rather than re-melting. The development of the blast furnace around one thousand years ago made it possible to convert steel scrap into liquid metal. And the first commercial Electric Arc Furnace (EAF), capable of using 100% scrap, was built in 1906.
Smaller, less costly to build, and more flexible to operate than blast furnaces, the spread of EAFs through the 20th century was limited only by the availability of scrap and electricity.
In the US, as demand for new steel approached saturation and as the steel in infrastructure and buildings constructed 40 or 50 years previously became available for recovery and recycling, scrap-based EAF production began to replace blast furnace steelmaking, even as the blast furnaces themselves used more scrap. Blast furnace production peaked in 1969, and no new blast furnace has been built in the US since 1980 (Construction Physics, 2023). Today, around 70% of steel in the US is made in EAFs (American Iron and Steel Institute, 2021).
The same pattern of increasing demand, met initially from primary production and then later through a growing reliance on scrap, is now playing itself out in Europe and China, is set to take off in south Asia, and it is to be hoped will roll out across Africa. Steel production globally is projected to peak in the second half of the 21st century, with scrap supply following 30 or 40 years after that.
The growth of scrap-based production has been driven by economics, of course, rather than by any concerns about the climate or greenhouse gas emissions – but that doesn’t make it any less welcome. A tonne of steel made entirely from scrap has around one-fifth of the greenhouse gas emissions of a tonne of steel made from iron ore.
Does that mean we can all relax, and recycle our way out of the climate crisis? Sadly not.
The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) estimates that the USA now recycles between 70% and 80% of all of its potentially available scrap (AISI, 2021). The World Steel Association (worldsteel) puts the global recycling rate even higher than that, at around 85% for end-of-life scrap.
Then why, despite these impressive recycling rates, is there currently only enough scrap to meet around one-third of the global demand for steel? The main reason is that scrap availability reflects the level of steel production a generation ago, rather than today. Steel production in 1985 was around 720 million tonnes. Today it is around two billion tonnes. Even without taking account of end-of-life recovery and furnace yield losses there is no way to make those numbers add up.
As demand for steel levels off in the future, a higher proportion of that demand will be met from scrap. In its ‘Sustainable Development Scenario’, in which the end-of-life recycling rate rises to 90%, the IEA estimates that there would be enough scrap to meet 45% of the demand for steel in 2050 (IEA, 2020). That is something to celebrate. But to put it the other way around, it would mean that 55% of the world’s steel – perhaps 1.2 billion tonnes of it – would still be made directly from iron ore.
To have any chance of limiting climate change to ‘well below 2 degrees’ and at the same time respecting the aspirations of 9 to 10 billion people, two things therefore need to happen. Firstly, the vast majority of primary steel will need to be made using ‘near zero’ emission sources of iron – using hydrogen-based direct reduction iron (DRI), direct electrolysis, biofuels, carbon capture or other new processes. And secondly, the electricity used in steelmaking will need to be generated with near zero emissions, whether it is used to power electric arc furnaces, hydrogen production, or direct electrolysis.
Those are the twin challenges for policy makers, steelmakers and steel users, and they apply across the whole sector.
To meet those challenges, they, and we, need to be able to compare the GHG emissions performance of all steelmaking on a like-for-like basis, whether steel is made from 100% scrap, 100% primary iron, or from any ratio of inputs in between – an approach pioneered in the ResponsibleSteel Production Standard, and recommended by the IEA, German Steel Association and others.
So let’s hear it for the recyclers, but also for the ‘near zero’ power generators, and the ‘near zero’ iron innovators.
And for a successful transition to a net-zero steel economy.
By Matthew Wenban-Smith
International Women's Day: Celebrating women working across the steel supply chain
In the second half of the twentieth century, women's participation in the global workforce grew remarkably. In the United States, female participation in the workforce surged from around 33% in 1948 to over 50% by the late 1970s (U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics). Similarly in Europe, countries like France and Germany saw a rise from around 45% in the 1960s to over 60% by the 1980s (OECD, 2021). And in South America, Brazil also witnessed significant progress, with participation growing from approximately 18% in 1960 to 40% in 1980 (World Bank, 2020).
Despite these advancements, industries like steel, mining, and metals remained predominantly male-dominated. A 2019 broad analysis of 66 global steel, metals, and mining companies revealed that women made up between just 3% and 29% of the workforce (S&P Global). Within the steel industry specifically, women account for only about 15% of the workforce, a figure that has remained largely unchanged over the past decade (World Steel Association, 2020). These figures illustrate the persistent challenges to achieving gender diversity within the steel and metals sectors, underscoring the need for continued progress.
As workplaces evolve and diversity initiatives gain momentum, more women are entering and excelling in traditionally male-dominated sectors. Their contributions are driving innovation, improving workplace culture, and challenging longstanding societal barriers.
In recognition of International Women’s Day, ResponsibleSteel is spotlighting a few of the women who are driving change across the steel supply chain – celebrating their impact, resilience, and leadership and emphasising the need for greater diversity and inclusion in the metals sector.
Above image courtesy of Borçelik
.png)
Elle Gatto
Assistant Team Leader - Finished Product Shipping, ArcelorMittal Dofasco
Elle has been with ArcelorMittal Dofasco for just over five years. As an Assistant Team Leader in Finished Product Shipping, she's passionate about working on the floor and ensuring steel moves efficiently. Her department is the last line of defense - she takes great pride in knowing that her role contributes to guaranteeing that only the highest-quality steel reaches customers. For Elle, being part of a team that keeps production running smoothly is rewarding and motivating, and she's looking forward to continuing to grow in the industry.
What is it like to be a woman in the steel industry?
"Being a woman in the steel industry has its challenges, but also presents unique opportunities for growth and leadership. It's empowering to contribute to an industry that is traditionally male-dominated, proving that diversity leads to stronger teams and more creative solutions. While there may be moments of being one of the few women in the room, I see it as a chance to break barriers and inspire the next generation of women in manufacturing and engineering fields."
Stefania Bonaiuti
Supplier Carbon Neutral, SKF
Stefania began her 28-year journey at SKF working in bearing product lines and later serving as the marketing manager for steel-related offerings. Currently, she focuses on Supplier Carbon Neutral deployment. Her career spans sustainability projects aimed at achieving net zero carbon emissions. Her experience in the steel industry and commitment to promoting sustainable practices continue to play an important part in advancing SKF's sustainability initiatives. She values the diverse perspectives women bring to the industry and actively supports gender balance and leadership development programmes at SKF.
What are your hopes for the future of the steel industry?
"Over the years, I have encountered many women in this field who brought diverse perspectives and innovative solutions, which are valuable in an evolving industry. Therefore, ensuring gender diversity remains crucial.
The future of the steel industry holds immense potential, rooted in sustainability, innovation, and inclusivity. Embracing cutting-edge technologies will enhance efficiency and reduce environmental impact. At SKF, we drive innovation with steel products that support our customers' sustainability goals. Collaboration within the industry and with other sectors is essential for sustainable change. We are proud to be part of initiatives like ResponsibleSteel, SteelZero, and RE100. By sharing knowledge and leveraging each other's strengths, we can tackle challenges effectively and drive the industry towards a more sustainable and prosperous future."
It's empowering to contribute to an industry that is traditionally male-dominated, proving that diversity leads to stronger teams and more creative solutions. - Elle Gatto, ArcelorMittal Dofasco
Tuana Çabuk
Production Engineer - Continuous Galvanizing Line, Borçelik
Tuana graduated with a degree in Mechanical Engineering. She has been working as a Production Engineer in the Continuous Galvanizing Line at Borçelik for two years. As a production engineer, she takes part in projects related to occupational safety, production processes, and quality performance of the lines she is responsible for.
What is it like to work in the steel industry?
"The steel industry is highly competitive and involves production processes that require advanced technology. As a result, it demands strong expertise in both engineering and production. Being actively involved in production processes and participating in various projects helps me to develop myself to be a better engineer. Since the steel industry is dynamic and requires technical proficiency, I believe that taking an active role in the manufacturing field, especially as a production engineer, provides a significant advantage.
Although the workforce is predominantly male, I take pride in contributing to the industry and promoting diversity as a female engineer. Gender diversity is a crucial issue, but I believe it should not be measured by having an equal number of men and women in every setting. Instead, it should be achieved by ensuring equal opportunities and a fair working environment for everyone. I feel fortunate to work in an organisation that supports this principle."
Dr. Ankita Gangotra
Senior Manager, World Resources Institute US
Ankita leads WRI's efforts to decarbonise the industrial sector through technology and policy innovation. Her work focuses on decarbonising the cement and steel industries, climate-oriented trade policies, green procurement standards, and fostering international cooperation. Ankita’s work includes advising U.S. policymakers and supporting industrial decarbonisation efforts in countries like India. Previously, she was a postdoctoral research fellow at Georgetown University, where she researched technology and policy options for industrial decarbonisation in the U.S.
What is it like to be a woman working on steel and heavy industry?
"I was apprehensive when starting work on the steel and industrial sector more broadly due to its male-dominated nature, but I’ve been inspired by the incredible women working on steel decarbonisation and their fierce advocacy. It’s been empowering to be surrounded by such passionate colleagues who are driving meaningful change. I hope we can accelerate the pace of steel decarbonisation while ensuring a just and equitable transition that benefits both communities and workers in the sector."
It's been very nice being a mentor and a point of call for other women. I like to think I've made other women in the industry proud. - Ashlea Muscat, BlueScope
Ashlea Muscat
Operations Manager Painting and Finishing Department, BlueScope
Ashlea joined the industry as a cadet in 2014 straight from university. After eleven years in the industry, she now runs the coil painting and finishing department at BlueScope’s Port Kembla Steelworks, looking after 126 people across 3 units and leading on day-to-day management, development, and process improvement across the department. Women now make up over 22% of BlueScope's site operators, a significant increase from 3% in 2017.
How did you get started in the steel industry?
"I first began in the industry as a cadet and I love all of the problem solving and challenging roles that I've held. It's been very nice being a mentor and a point of call for other women. I like to think I've made other women in the industry proud."
Aimee Boulanger
Executive Director, Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance
Aimee has worked on mining issues for over 25 years, with substantial experience in directly affected communities. She has served IRMA’s leadership since 2011 and her role is to guide an organisation which is fully accountable to multi-stakeholder leadership, creating market value for more responsible business practices while ensuring credibility and accountability to all stakeholders.
What are your hopes for the future of the steel and mining sectors?
"I hope for a future where companies that create the products we rely on every day are valued not just for what they make, but for how they make it, ensuring that people, their lands, and their wellbeing are respected at every step. This means greater transparency in industries like mining and steel, so we acknowledge our shared impact and work together to reduce harm. And as we do, I hope we centre the voices of women—whose leadership, labour, and lives are so often overlooked—so that the benefits of industry are shared more equitably by all."
I hope for a future where companies that create the products we rely on every day are valued not just for what they make, but for how they make it... And as we do, I hope we centre the voices of women—whose leadership, labour, and lives are so often overlooked—so that the benefits of industry are shared more equitably by all. - Aimee Boulanger, IRMA
Angelica Olsson
Manager - Safety and Sustainability, Outokumpu
Angelica has worked her whole career in different types of industries. Before joining Outokumpu, she worked for several years in the paper industry as well as in the sawmill industry. She's held various positions, but she has the most experience in Supply Chain Management. She joined Outokumpu in 2018 and her first role was as a Safety Engineer for fire and security issues. Since 2022, she has worked as a Safety & Sustainability Manager.
What is it like to work in the steel industry?
"The steel industry has been by far the most interesting and challenging industry that I’ve worked in. The products we produce are fascinating and we all need to work every day to ensure that the way we produce steel is safe and sustainable. In my role as a Safety & Sustainability Manager, I’m fortunate to work with a great team of safety and sustainability engineers, and together we work hard every day, enabling our mills to produce safe and sustainable stainless steel. I really feel that the work we do makes a difference."
Marnie Bammert
Independent Consultant to ResponsibleSteel
Marnie is an independent consultant with 20 years of experience in developing, implementing and communicating sustainability certification and verification programmes. She has worked with ResponsibleSteel since early 2018. Marnie started her journey in the field of sustainability with oekom Research AG, a rating agency specialised in sustainable and ethical investments. She then moved to the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC), holding various positions including Deputy Director Europe. Since then, Marnie has worked as a consultant on projects ranging from protected areas to infrastructure, mining and nature-based solutions.
Why did you first begin working on the steel industry?
"People tend to focus on GHG emissions when discussing sustainability challenges of the steel sector. But the climate crisis cannot be solved in isolation. Working with ResponsibleSteel, I wanted to raise awareness for other important issues that the sector faces - human and labour rights, biodiversity, water stewardship, to name just a few. They are all connected to the climate question. I am proud to have played an instrumental part in creating the ResponsibleSteel Standard since it brings all of those issues together."
I envision a future for steel where much greater systems thinking, as well as intra- and inter- sector collaboration, drives progress - all enriched by the leadership of women. - Jen Carson, Climate Group
Jen Carson
Head of Heavy Industry, Climate Group
Jen Carson leads the strategy and growth of Climate Group's SteelZero and ConcreteZero. With a decade's worth experience working in the sustainability sector, she works to accelerate heavy industry decarbonisation. Jen joined Climate Group in 2021 after leading energy market research as an Associate at Delta-EE in Australia. Previously, she held various roles at Delta-EE, including creating its first cross-technology research service, as well as at The Carbon Trust, Dunelm Energy, and Kier Group.
What are your hopes for the future of the steel industry?
"I envision a future for steel where much greater systems thinking, as well as intra- and inter- sector collaboration, drives progress - all enriched by the leadership of women. By elevating the contribution of the demand side, and championing a competitive, decarbonised future, we will build a resilient steel industry that sets new standards for what is and isn't acceptable."
In conversation with IRMA and ResponsibleSteel: Exploring the role of standards in driving a responsible transition in steel and mining
ResponsibleSteel and the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA) are collaborating on a joint project to better understand the social impacts of the net-zero transition for the steel and mining sectors and how standards can help guide good practice. This project is possible thanks to a grant from the ISEAL Innovations Fund, which is supported by the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs SECO.
We have asked the two project leads, Haruko Horii, Standards Manager at ResponsibleSteel, and Davidzo Muchawaya, Africa Regional Lead at IRMA, to answer a short Q&A for readers to better understand the project itself.
Q: Haruko, what is the vision for the project?
With this project, we want to understand the social impacts of the transition to net zero and what role standards can play in guiding good practice.
The term ‘just transition’ is used by different people in different ways. We need to determine what this looks like for the mining and steel sectors. What exactly is a just transition? Whose transition are we discussing? Workers, local communities or supply chains? What is the scope of transition? These are some of the questions we need to consider.
Decarbonisation could have adverse social impacts such as job losses or displacement and significant effects on weakening the economic viability of affected communities. Initial research has shown that communities are facing significant social impacts caused by the transition to low-carbon practices. For instance, thousands of people have lost their jobs as a result of shifting from blast furnace technology to electric arc furnaces. These job losses have in turn impacted the wider community’s economic stability, community identity, and overall well-being.
These are the types of issues we aim to identify through this project, assessing how voluntary sustainability standards (VSS) can address them, identifying gaps, and outlining steps for future, more detailed work that could lead to larger-scale initiatives. We’ll test our findings by engaging with workers, unions, business leaders, community organisations, and other relevant stakeholders to identify an agreed approach and create practical guidance for players in the mining and steel industry.
Q: Davidzo, what do ResponsibleSteel and IRMA have in common, and why are they collaborating on a just transition?
We believe in the power of collaboration and mutual recognition. This project is just one of many examples of how different voluntary sustainability standards can complement and leverage each other's work. Specifically, ResponsibleSteel leverages the assurance system of standards such as IRMA’s at mine site level, while focusing on the steel production aspects. Importantly, both ResponsibleSteel and IRMA were founded on a multi-stakeholder governance system, which has been recognised as a leading practice both by industry and NGOs. This model is recognised as best practice to ensure transparency, accountability, and inclusivity.
The collaboration specific to a just transition is born out of the necessity to ensure two hard-to-abate sectors, steel and mining, address the realities workers and communities are facing in our changing world as many existing mine and steelmaking sites face adaptation or closure. Given the varying impacts of decarbonisation across regions, IRMA and ResponsibleSteel are uniquely positioned to provide frameworks that apply across these different contexts since they are both standard-setting organisations operating globally. What is more, they are able to consider both decarbonisation and the potential social impacts of the transition at the same time.
Q: How do each of you respectively integrate just transition into your standards?
Haruko: Standards are going to play a critical role in promoting accountability during the transition ensuring they are fair and equitable. Although there is no explicit reference to a just transition in the current ResponsibleSteel International Production Standard, there are some elements to address the transition under Principle 4: Decommissioning and Closure, which requires consultation with key stakeholders to minimise any adverse impacts of site closures. In future, the scope of this principle could be expanded to address issues related to site closures, or the Production Standard could adopt a different approach by providing a just transition framework giving steel producers guidelines and tools to navigate an equitable transition with workers and affected communities. We plan to discuss these approaches with stakeholders in the next phases of the project. Integrating practices into the Production Standard will help ensure the industry’s transition is both environmentally and socially just.
Davidzo: As for the IRMA Standard for Responsible Mining, multiple chapters and requirements articulate what best practices could and should be for mining operations wishing to ensure a just transition for workers and affected communities. A prominent example is the requirement to involve affected communities and stakeholders in the development, design, and implementation of the mine rehabilitation and closure plan. Going beyond minimum transparency, the IRMA Standard outlines a series of requirements dedicated to the adequate estimation and financing of mine closure and post-closure. Research shows that mining operations often leave behind environmental and social liabilities, without taking charge of costs associated with the rehabilitation or appropriate closure of the sites thereby foregoing an adequate transition.
Crucially, the role played by both ResponsibleSteel and IRMA would not be the same without their multi-stakeholder governance systems. Thanks to the decision making process that takes into account private sector players as well as rights holders and labour unions, they can ensure that the voices of all parties are heard and taken into account in an equal way - hopefully adding the “just” element to “transition”.
Q: Davidzo, who is the main audience for this project?
The main audience for this project is workers and labour unions, as workers are most directly affected by the transition. Operators, from mining companies to steelmakers, are also key since, as employers, their actions and decisions will be critical to the social impacts of the transition, alongside national and subnational governments. Local communities impacted by the transition, NGOs that aim to act in their interests and standard-setting organisations are also key stakeholders.
Q: Haruko, is there a specific geographic focus for the project?
While just transition challenges and opportunities vary from country to country and even from site to site, the project is truly global as it strives to bring the complexities of these different realities to light. We aim to engage with stakeholders across different regions during the project to hear about the realities of the transition in different contexts. More information on this to come!
To find out more about IRMA, visit responsiblemining.net. To find out more about the project background, visit this page on the ISEAL website.
Davidzo Muchawaya is the Regional Lead for Africa at the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA), where she leverages her extensive 15-plus years of experience in responsible sourcing and sustainability to further IRMA's vision. This vision aims to create a world where the mining industry respects the human rights and aspirations of affected communities, provides safe, healthy and supportive workplaces, minimizes environmental harm, and leaves positive legacies. Davidzo's responsibilities include leading the development and implementation of strategies for regional outreach to extend and deepen engagement with a broad spectrum of stakeholders, such as civil society organizations, labour unions, and communities impacted by mining activities. Davidzo plays a role in facilitating the dissemination of IRMA's audit reports and implementing awareness initiatives to enhance understanding of the IRMA system among stakeholders.
Davidzo is currently co-leading an ISEAL-funded project that explores how voluntary sustainability standards can drive a responsible transition in the steel and mining sectors. The project aims to understand the social impacts of the industry's shift toward a low-carbon economy and the role of multi-stakeholder systems initiatives in ensuring a socially responsible transition.
Haruko Horii has 9 years of experience in the sustainability sector, including work with NGOs and a social auditing consultancy firm. In her previous roles with standard-setting organisations, she has worked on various social topics such as living wage, social impact assessment, and gender equality, while ensuring the team’s compliance with standard-setting best practices. Haruko is trained in social auditing (SA8000) and social impact assessment (IAIA). She has worked as a social auditor and consultant, assisting global companies in promoting human rights by developing social responsibility policies and strategies, and establishing assurance mechanisms through capacity-building activities, social audits, and assessments.
Haruko holds a Master’s degree in International Development from Wageningen University in the Netherlands.
Leading steel companies and NGOs agree to International Standard on climate for industry
Created by ResponsibleSteel members, including some of the world’s largest steel companies and most respected social justice and climate NGOs, ResponsibleSteel International Standard V2.0 will play a pivotal role in driving down GHG emissions and driving up standards in the steel supply chain, helping steel companies transition to a responsible, decarbonised future.
As the world grapples with the impact of climate change, the new ResponsibleSteel Standard, launched today, focuses more deeply than ever before on reducing GHG emissions and now enables buyers of steel for the first time to specify what green procurement means in a credible way.
After years of hard and complex work, ResponsibleSteel is extremely proud to announce its revised Standard 2.0. Leading steel companies including ArcelorMittal, Tata Steel, US Steel, thyssenkrupp, POSCO, BlueScope, and voestalpine worked with others along the steel value chain to support the standard’s development, as well as leading environmental NGOs the Climate Group, Ceres, the Clean Air Task Force, We Mean Business, and Mighty Earth. The launch of this Standard will provide leaders in the steel industry with an immediate opportunity to showcase how they are driving down emissions, whilst tackling other urgent issues such as the impact of mining, water use, labour rights, air pollution, and diversity. It’s an expert yet practical road map for radical and innovative change in the world of steel.
“The progressive steel industry, business and civil society and associate Members should be very proud today. They have worked together to produce a breakthrough standard. This means we now have a workable standard to certify steel products which meet the highest possible sustainability metrics,” commented Gerry Tidd, Chairman of the Board of Directors.
He continued, “steel customers can now be confident in specifying ResponsibleSteel certified steel products. The Standard sets a new high watermark for steelmakers, their supply chain and customers who want to address essential issues like biodiversity, GHG emissions, labour rights, water, and waste.”
The ResponsibleSteel Standard is unique in addressing not only climate change but other issues also across the whole ESG spectrum. It has taken years of expertise and cross sector buy-in to create the new revisions which are even more exacting than before and pertain specifically to GHG emissions and the responsible sourcing of input materials.
“ResponsibleSteel’s new International Standard comes at a critical time, with the unfolding energy crisis alongside the climate challenge only magnifying the need for a global scale transition to a decarbonised economy. By providing a practical tool for both steelmakers and all their stakeholders to measure and reward progress, it paves the way for society to work together on this gargantuan challenge” said ResponsibleSteel CEO Annie Heaton. “The Standard enables anyone that’s either buying or making steel to demonstrate they are not only driving down emissions, but also thinking responsibly about impacts on people and nature right across the value chain.”
She continued, “With the publication of this Standard, we invite every steel company in the world to adopt it, every customer to ask for it and every finance house to endorse it, so that together, as a community of the willing and through dynamic collaboration we can generate the necessary investments required for this vital transition.”
ResponsibleSteel believes the publication of this Standard will send a clear signal to steel customers, the market, investors, policy makers and government leaders that this is a Standard the world can trust, is wholly transparent, will push back against greenwashing and will ultimately pave the way towards a net zero steel industry with sustainability at its core.
Learn more about the development of ResponsibleSteel International Standard V2.0 here.
Endorsements:
“We are encouraged by the progress ResponsibleSteel is making in terms of both enhancing the scope and diversity of its membership base and strengthening the rigour and extent of its certification process. Its members now include an impressively broad range of companies across the steel value chain as well as civil society actors, while the revamped standard being launched today not only improves the existing site level certification standard but introduces a product standard for the first time. Having been a member since its inception, we are pleased to continue to work closely with ResponsibleSteel on the evolution of its industry certification scheme which we believe has an important role to play in driving ESG standards across our industry.” – James Streater, Head of Sustainable Development, ArcelorMittal.
“The ResponsibleSteel Standard and certification program is an important example of multi-stakeholder collaboration for sustainable change across the steel value chain. Driven by the collaborative effort of industry and civil society, it has been designed to give customers, stakeholders and consumers confidence that the steel they use has been sourced and produced responsibly. BlueScope is pleased to have contributed to the development of the ResponsibleSteel Standard and the additional requirements.” – Tim Rodsted, Head of Sustainability, BlueScope.
“Tangible action to decarbonise the steel industry is ramping up, especially with the finalisation of the ResponsibleSteel Standard V2.0. We now have clear requirements on both greenhouse gas emissions and responsible sourcing of input materials. As the Standard forms a key part of our SteelZero commitment, these additional requirements will strengthen and clarify the collective voice of our members, boosting the demand signal for low emission and net zero steel and accelerating the net zero transition of one of the highest emitting sectors on the planet.” – Jen Carson, Head of Industry, Climate Group.
“Mighty Earth is proud to be a stakeholder in what will soon become the global standard for low-emission and responsibly sourced steel. We urge automakers and other steel buyers to get behind this. Choosing ResponsibleSteel-certified materials sends a strong message to steelmakers that investing in renewable energy-powered steelmaking makes sense economically and environmentally. This standard goes beyond greenhouse emissions and also includes critical environmental safeguards, ensuring that deforestation has no place in the steel industry’s future.” – Glenn Hurowitz, Founder and CEO, Mighty Earth.
“Lendlease endorses the establishment of ResponsibleSteel’s product certification standard. As a 1.5 degree aligned company we support globally consistent standards which provide product assurance and streamlined procurement along with a clear signal about our expectations of a responsible and decarbonised supply chain.” – Cate Harris, Group Head of Sustainability, Lendlease.
“SKF joined the Responsible Steel Initiative because steel is such an important part of our value chain and because we want to play our part in collaborating for increased sustainability within the steel industry. We are very proud to have been part of the process to define the additional requirements in this new version of the RSI standard. This is an important step, which provides producers and users of steel with common ways to measure and drive improved performance in both climate and social aspects. We look forward to working to promote the adoption of this standard and to the improved sustainability performance that will surely follow that.” – Rob Jenkinson, Net Zero Program Manager, SKF.
For more information/press interviews with ResponsibleSteel or its members please contact:
Ali Lucas, Director of Communications
alucas@responsiblesteel.org
+44 7786 546724
Savannah Hayes, Communications Manager
shayes@responsiblesteel.org
+44 7588 785909
Today marks a pivotal moment in the path to sustainable, net zero steel
It’s been quite a journey. Today, after almost three years of collective commitment from the giants of the steel industry and leading NGOs, ResponsibleSteel is launching its new International Standard V2.0, with tough new additional requirements on both climate and responsible sourcing, after they were adopted with the support of 96% of our membership vote.
So what does this mean? For the first time, steelmakers will be able to gain credible recognition in the market for the progress they make – both on decarbonisation and on driving sustainability through their supply chains – because they have been independently certified against a common, agreed, international standard. Buyers of steel can specify it in what they ask of their suppliers. So too can those who finance the industry and the costly transition to come.
I am certain that the launch of ResponsibleSteel V2.0 represents a pivotal moment for the steel industry. The course is set, and it’s now time to build the momentum and drive the creation of a new, decarbonised steel industry with sustainability at its core.
To reach this moment, many thousands of hours have been spent by a coalition of the willing – experts from across the steel value chain, NGOs, academics and many others, working alongside the ResponsibleSteel team in complex discussions, exacting analysis, demanding debate, critical feedback, drafting, redrafting … and finally, a standard that sets a clear direction for the industry and its stakeholders. I want to sincerely thank everyone involved.
V2.0 will be challenging to implement – the revised standard now includes 13 Principles, 61 Criteria and over 500 individual requirements. This robustness, and our growing Assurance Programme, are what lend ResponsibleSteel credibility both in the market and in the wider ESG world. And we will strengthen these further, continually growing our membership to bring everyone involved in, continually working to ensure the Standard is fit for the entire global industry, and continually building our Assurance Programme.
Over the coming weeks, we’ll be exploring the implications of V2.0 for the industry’s future at key events in the run-up to COP27, starting next week with New York Climate Week.
Then from 31 October to 1 November, at the ResponsibleSteel Forum III in Memphis, our entire membership along with our Board will take the opportunity to look at how key actors in the steel value chain can use V2.0 to shape the dynamics of steel decarbonisation and wider sustainability, globally. There are some spaces for those who haven’t yet joined ResponsibleSteel – if you haven’t already registered to attend Forum III, you can do so here.
Finally, I want to take a moment to thank the authors who led us on this journey and were critical to making this moment happen – Marnie Bammert, who led on the responsible sourcing requirements, and Matthew Wenban-Smith who led on the greenhouse gas side. Their clarity of thought and continued commitment has been invaluable. Both Matthew and Marnie will continue to advise ResponsibleSteel as we move forward on our critical journey.
Once again, my thanks go out to all of you who have helped us achieve this momentous step forward. What we’ve created together is the beginning of a new phase for ResponsibleSteel and for the entire industry.
August 2022 Newsletter
Please view our August 2022 newsletter by clicking the link below:
July 2022 Newsletter
Please view our July 2022 newsletter by clicking the link below:
Celebrating One Year Since ResponsibleSteel’s First Site Certifications
This week, we celebrate the one-year anniversary of the first site certifications carried out to the ResponsibleSteel Standard. The ArcelorMittal sites in Belgium, Luxembourg and Germany were the first sites to be independently audited and found to meet the exacting criteria contained in the ResponsibleSteel Standard.
The certifications marked an industry-first as the sites made a commitment to implementing the standard, encompassing 12 ESG principles promoting responsible steel production. A year on, ResponsibleSteel has now issued a total of 12 certificates covering 41 different sites. Currently, we have certified sites across 9 countries in Europe, North America, South America, and Australia. To add to this, we have a further 8 audits in the pipeline.
The ResponsibleSteel audit process is twofold: the first step is a self-assessment while the second is an audit carried out by an approved ResponsibleSteel certification body involving onsite visits and interviews with a wide range of stakeholders. This thorough and rigorous process reflects ResponsibleSteel’s multi-perspective approach and our dedication to ensuring that certified sites meet the carefully defined criteria set out in our standard.
As the steel industry’s first global multi-stakeholder standard and certification initiative, the site certifications awarded to ArcelorMittal last year were only the beginning. We are incredibly proud to see the increasing application of our standard globally and we are excited to continue our work to transform ResponsibleSteel’s vision to maximise steel’s contribution to a sustainable society into a reality.
A huge thank you to our members and other stakeholders for your continued support of our mission. We look forward to continuing with you on this important journey!
To learn more about our standard and the certification process, click here.
ResponsibleSteel™ Site Certification Awarded to ArcelorMittal France Nord
Following the certification of ArcelorMittal Méditerranée earlier this year, ArcelorMittal France Nord announces that it has obtained ResponsibleSteel™ certification. The certification marks ArcelorMittal France Nord’s commitment to implementing our Standard, which encompasses 12 environmental, social and governance principles that promote responsible steel production.
ArcelorMittal France Nord is an entity of ArcelorMittal Europe – Flat Products. The certification covers seven sites: Dunkirk, Mardyck, Desvres, Montataire, Florange, Mouzon, and Basse-Indre. The cluster employs around 7000 workers and contractors and produces flat steel products for a range of sectors such as the packaging and automotive industries.
Commenting on the certification, Matthieu Jehl, Managing Director of ArcelorMittal France Nord, stated, “our customers and stakeholders expect a quality product from us but also a more sustainable contribution to society. The ResponsibleSteel™ certification allows us to demonstrate our commitment to this goal. It is an additional asset that is part of our management system and our continuous progressive approach.”
The certification follows two stages of auditing which began in December 2021. The auditing was conducted by an independent ResponsibleSteel approved body, AFNOR. During the audit process, over 150 interviews were conducted with workers and independent stakeholders to discuss potential issues. The audit process highlighted several areas of good practice including the cluster’s structured roadmap to achieve a 35% reduction in GHG emissions by 2030.
Annie Heaton, CEO of ResponsibleSteel, stated, “We are very pleased to welcome the ArcelorMittal France Nord cluster to our expanding family of ResponsibleSteel certified sites. As more and more sites become certified, we move closer to ResponsibleSteel’s vision of maximising steel’s contribution to a sustainable society. And we look forward to continuing to support ArcelorMittal France Nord on this journey.”
To find out more about the certification, click here or take a look at our audit summary here.
Carbon Re Talks Creativity and Innovation in the Steel Industry
Creativity and innovation are an integral part of the steel industry. To mark World Creativity and Innovation Day, we asked Buffy Price and Sherif Elsayed-Ali, co-founders and current COO and CEO of ResponsibleSteel member Carbon Re, a few questions about what they think the next steps are for the sector in terms of utilising new technology and artificial intelligence to advance decarbonisation initiatives.
1. Many people might not immediately think of steel when discussing World Creativity and Innovation Day, but these have played a major role in the development of the industry. Why do you think it is so important to apply this same creative approach to decarbonisation?
Steel is probably more intertwined with creativity and innovation than any other material, both with regards to its uses and how different steels are made. The invention of steel itself was one of the biggest industrial innovations in human history, taking iron ore and transforming it into an incredibly versatile and reliable alloy.
The beauty of steel is that it’s at home in everything from building structures to sculptures and spacecraft. The properties of steel allow industrial designers, architects and artists to create an infinite variety of tools, machines, buildings, and art.
Today there are four main types of steel and more than 3,500 grades, each with properties tuned for specific applications. This huge number is only possible because of the talent and continuous innovation in the steel industry.
2. How is Carbon Re currently working to support steel decarbonisation?
Steel is a very hard industry to decarbonize. Carbon Re’s focus is on developing solutions that bring financial and climate benefits to steel producers today—solutions that can be scaled rapidly. We are doing this by leveraging the huge advances in computation and artificial intelligence to help optimize steel production, reducing energy costs and emissions simultaneously.
Steelmaking may seem like a known quantity—in general terms it is, but it is also very complex, with physical and chemical interactions constantly changing as a result of the chemistry of fuels and materials, the state of equipment and the natural variation in the process.
We leverage the huge amount of data produced by industrial sensors and IoT to build a digital twin of the production process that reproduces the specific characteristics of a given plant, rather than being a generalised physics-based model. This digital twin then acts as a virtual training environment for artificial intelligence agents that learn through a method called reinforcement learning, a branch of AI particularly well-suited to complex environments whereby the AI learns by trial and error.
The results are AI agents that support operator decision-making, enabling dynamic adjustments of the production process to produce the desired amount of material, with the required quality at very efficient energy levels.
3. We are very proud to have Carbon Re as a member of ResponsibleSteel. What made you want to be part of the growing RS community?
The world is not moving fast enough to tackle climate change and most technological solutions are 10 years off impact and scale. We absolutely must take a multi-pronged collaborative approach to decarbonization and building a community like ResponsibleSteel is a vital part of that process. In fact, ResponsibleSteel has emerged as the leading global initiative to accelerate decarbonization in the steel industry and we are very proud to be part of it.
4. How do you think we can better support decarbonisation in the steel industry?
There are a number of challenges to decarbonization: technical, financial and regulatory. On the technical side, we need to encourage fast innovation and technology demonstration. Financially, we need the right incentives to encourage decarbonization—whether these take the form of carbon pricing or tax credits. Finally, on the regulatory side, we need active policies to support the steel industry to reduce its carbon intensity including, for example, responsive building codes that enable, rather than hinder, innovation in building materials.
5. Why do you think it is so important to have a global steel standard?
We think it is important to create a level playing field across the industry by ensuring consistency and transparency across measurement and reporting mechanisms. This not only substantiates claims and provides benchmarks for progress but also empowers steel buyers to make the right decisions to fulfil their own decarbonization objectives.
6. We are currently revising our ResponsibleSteel Standard to include enhanced GHG emissions and sourcing criteria. What do you foresee as the greatest challenges in tackling emissions in the steel sector?
The biggest challenge is almost certainly the substantial costs associated with most decarbonization solutions and dealing with legacy infrastructure. But there are low-cost solutions that can help tackle carbon emissions in the short to medium term.
7. What steps should steelmakers be taking to decarbonise? What innovations should they be adopting?
First, we have to acknowledge two realities.
The first is that the widespread use of steel is essential to modern societies and that there is no real replacement for it—not just because of its versatility but because iron is one of the most abundant elements in the world. The world produces close to two billion tons of steel every year, second only to cement as the most produced material in the world.
The second reality is that producing steel produces a lot of CO2 emissions, both due to the types of fuel used—such as coal—and the process CO2 emissions in blast furnace steelmaking. Today, these are very hard to decarbonize. There are technological solutions such as CCUS and green hydrogen, but they face many challenges for widespread adoption, including costs, energy requirements and storage/reuse requirements (for CCUS).
These technologies will evolve and become more affordable with time, but we simply can’t wait to start decarbonizing. I think we need to think of decarbonization in the steel industry in terms of three phases:
- Optimizing the use of existing assets
- Improving existing assets, for example by retrofitting CCUS
- Building a new generation of low-carbon assets
At Carbon Re, our focus today is optimizing the use of existing assets by delivering technology that provides near immediate financial and decarbonization benefits to steelmakers and that can be scaled rapidly.
8. How important do you think artificial intelligence is in the fight against climate change?
AI is a foundational technology—it can enable new applications in almost every industry, but it doesn’t work alone. When combined with industry-specific expertise and with other scientific fields such as chemistry and material sciences, it can accelerate the development of new solutions and new discoveries.
As such, AI has a very important role in the fight against climate change—from measuring emissions to modelling climate change to improving industrial processes and designing new low-carbon materials.
At Carbon Re, we are building a world-class multidisciplinary team, not just to bring the latest AI techniques to steelmaking, but to push the state-of-the-art of what’s possible to make the decarbonization of the industry a reality.
Buffy Price is co-founder & COO of Carbon Re. She was formerly AI for Climate Partnerships Manager at Element AI and Senior Advisor at Amnesty International. Buffy has extensive experience in change management, organizational processes and project management.
Sherif Elsayed-Ali is co-founder & CEO. A construction engineer by training, he has extensive experience in technology innovation and leadership. Before Carbon Re, Sherif led the AI for climate practice at Element AI and co-founded Amnesty Tech. He has a BSc from the Americana University in Cairo and an MPA from Harvard Kennedy School.
IndustriALL discusses the importance of building a safe and responsible steel sector
To mark World Day for Safety and Health at Work, we spoke with Matthias Hartwich, Director for Mechanical Engineering and Base Metals at ResponsibleSteel member IndustriALL, about the importance of a safe and healthy workplace, labour rights, and how we can work to build a more responsible steel industry.
Why is World Safety Day important?
The members of our affiliated unions, the men and women, all workers, are the ones who make the steel. They are the ones who either live or die, who return in either good or bad health from their workplaces in the steel industry. If anything goes wrong, they pay with their health, or even with their lives. That is why we support every effort to improve working conditions and occupational health and safety measures.
It’s so important having you as a member of ResponsibleSteel – what do you think the main benefits are in being part of our community?
For IndustriALL, it is important to represent our affiliates in a growing organization aimed at producing steel in a responsible way. Within ResponsibleSteel, we, as a global trade union can give the men and women working in the industry a voice in the discussions on ResponsibleSteel’s standards and on what producing steel in a responsible manner means for workers and their unions around the world. Having this multi-stakeholder approach is crucial.
You do extraordinary work on labour relations and trade union advocacy worldwide – how do you think ResponsibleSteel can better contribute to our shared agenda?
We will invite ResponsibleSteel’s CEO to our next sectorial steering committee meeting as a guest speaker. I hope this will give us a better understanding of where we can cooperate and where we cannot. I am sure there is a lot of common ground to cover, but responsibility is also on our end. IndustriALL needs to provide input so that ResponsibleSteel can see where the organization can and wants to contribute.
What do you think the top three priorities should be for the steel sector right now in relation to social justice/human rights/labour rights?
Most importantly, I think that a general understanding and respect for ILO Core Labour Standards & Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work are crucial in every steel and mining operation that seeks to be certified by ResponsibleSteel.
Today, on International Workers’ Memorial Day, we are remembering our dead or disabled colleagues in the steel sector. Hence, a core question is to make sure that the ILO conventions referring to health and safety are respected and reviewed during certification procedures. The conventions are:
- Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention no. 187
- Occupational Safety and Health Convention no. 155
- Occupational Health Services Convention no. 161
It is also crucial to adopt a general approach of Just Transition in the steel industry. This goes beyond ResponsibleSteel’s remit, but we think that a changing steel industry needs the workers’ perspective when it comes to piloting through the upcoming changes in our important industry.
Why is it so important to have a global standard for the steel industry? How does this help to protect workers’ rights?
Workers’ and unions’ rights must become indispensable when certifying steel. ResponsibleSteel can be of great support to achieve this. The standard can deliver and support this – especially if we train our certification bodies accordingly.
What does responsibility mean to you in relation to the steel industry and workers’ rights?
Steel producers along the value chain must accept responsibility for fair treatment of their employees, including sub-contractors. The ILO conventions above are key. If every steel producer in the world applies these standards, we will make huge progress, both for the workers, but also for the industry as a whole.
As ResponsibleSteel has started to engage the global steel industry in its certification programme, what do you foresee being the greatest challenges to this process and how might we overcome them?
So far, some steel producers do not include workers’ rights in their responsibilities. This may be partly due to a lack of knowledge and partly due to disrespect. Auditors and certification bodies must keep an eye on this during the certification process. In addition, our affiliated unions need to keep an eye on ongoing certifications and must sound the alarm if things are not progressing according to our standards. All elements of ResponsibleSteel’s Standard must be respected in order to become certified.
Where would you like to see the steel industry by 2030 in terms of labour relations? What do you think we should be hoping to achieve?
I’d love to see a steel world where ILO Core Conventions and Health and Safety conventions are respected in every steel operation worldwide. This should happen for the direct employees, but also for the indirect, or subcontracted workers, as well as for the workers along the supply chain. I hope that we achieve to cover a critical size of the annual tonnage with our standard and with respective certifications.
What does climate justice mean to your members/IndustriALL?
This is easy and hard to achieve. We demand what we call Just Transition. This simply means that no worker – regardless of blue or white collar, regardless of directly employed or subcontracted – is left behind in the transition process that the steel industry will go through.
In other words: we want to see a climate-neutral steel industry that still offers clean, healthy and good workplaces, where men and women in the industry are proud to contribute to responsibly produced, climate-neutral steel. This is what sustainability is all about.
IndustriALL Global Union represents 50 million workers in 140 countries in the mining, energy and manufacturing sectors and is a force in global solidarity taking up the fight for better working conditions and trade union rights around the world.
IndustriALL challenges the power of multinational companies and negotiates with them on a global level. IndustriALL fights for another model of globalization and a new economic and social model that puts people first, based on democracy and social justice.
With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility: LRQA Takes Us Inside the ResponsibleSteel Audit Process
As the world’s largest materials industry, steel holds the power to impact the planet like few others. Aware of the responsibility this entails, stakeholders of the steel industry around the world joined forces to create the global non-profit organization ResponsibleSteel.
To maximize steel’s contribution to a sustainable future, ResponsibleSteel developed the industry’s first global multi-stakeholder standard and certification initiative. Far more than a mere badge of honor, a ResponsibleSteel certification can provide steel manufacturers and others in the industry with a clear competitive advantage. Thus, major organizations start to expressly reward their contractors for sourcing from ResponsibleSteel-certified suppliers.
For LRQA, the decision to become accredited as a ResponsibleSteel certification body was a no-brainer. After all, LRQA’s ties to the steel industry date back to the early days of steel shipbuilding, for which LRQA-precursor Lloyd’s Register provided the first standards in 1888. This background and our corporate strategy with its strong focus on sustainability make LRQA ideally suited for the new standard – and the accreditation the logical next step for the company. In 2021, LRQA completed the first ResponsibleSteel audit for a client who is now one of the very first steel manufacturers worldwide to receive a ResponsibleSteel certification for their site.
The auditing process for the ResponsibleSteel certification reflects the organization’s multi-perspective approach. Audits are conducted in two steps, the first being a thorough self-assessment conducted by the applying company for their respective site, the second, the actual audit carried out by the auditing company.
Unlike other standards, ResponsibleSteel audits also involve external stakeholders. Auditors interview not only employees but also representatives from communities, NGOs, environmental agencies, and others. To create the atmosphere of trust and openness needed for these discussions, auditors need considerable social skills. Communication is key, not only during the interviews but also as a basic ResponsibleSteel requirement. Steel companies have to be able to demonstrate that they are willing to cooperate with stakeholders, including NGOs and the general public – and that also means that they need to communicate openly and proactively.
Another distinguishing characteristic of the ResponsibleSteel Standard is its sheer scope. Auditors need to be fluent in a broad bandwidth of topics, from ethical governance, health and safety, human rights, and the collaboration with interest groups to greenhouse gas and noise emissions, water management, biodiversity, and decommissioning procedures. Here, too, LRQA benefits from our auditors’ extensive sustainability and certification expertise.
First introduced in late 2019, the ResponsibleSteel Standard comprises 12 principles covering governance, social and environmental factors, a total of 49 criteria, and 200 requirements. “ResponsibleSteel Certified Site”, the first official certification issued by ResponsibleSteel, is awarded to steel company sites that comply with all 12 ResponsibleSteel principles. As an international standard developed by multiple organizations and stakeholders, ResponsibleSteel is recognized globally. Reaching beyond standards like ISO 9001, 14001, and 45001, ResponsibleSteel demands that applicants commit fully and actively to human rights and climate protection and support this commitment through dedicated initiatives and throughout their entire supply chain.
By Sabine Bradac, a ResponsibleSteel auditor, LRQA
Sabine Bradac is an auditor for LRQA, a ResponsibleSteel approved certification body. A trained technical chemist and process engineer, she joined LRQA in 2016, bringing 17 years of experience in the metal casting industry. In addition to ResponsibleSteel, she conducts audits for ISO 9001/14001/45001 and 50001.
About LRQA
LRQA is a leading global assurance provider, bringing together decades of expertise in brand assurance, certification, cybersecurity, inspection and training, to help its clients negotiate a rapidly changing risk landscape.
Operating in more than 160 countries and recognized by over 30 accreditation bodies worldwide, LRQA covers almost every sector, and helps clients to manage risk across the entire supply chain, drive operational improvements and build credibility with stakeholders.
ArcelorMittal Bremen’s Hobby Beekeepers
In celebration of World Bee Day, we caught up with two hobby beekeepers from one of our ResponsibleSteel certified sites, ArcelorMittal Bremen. The bee colonies were set up as part of the site’s Sports and Interest Group back in 2017 and quickly became a hit. Peter Wesling and Oliver Rahe discuss how they got into beekeeping and how the project has brought workers at ArcelorMittal Bremen closer together.
The idea of keeping bee colonies on the premises of a steel factory is a unique one – how did this project get started?
The impetus for this project came in 2017 from Maike Schäfer, then leader of the Bündnis 90/Die Grünen parliamentary group and today’s Senator for climate protection, the environment, mobility, urban development and housing construction. During an exchange with our management, the protection of bees was one of the topics discussed. As a result, the Sports and Interest Group (SIG) was asked whether they could set up a division for hobby beekeepers. A group of employees quickly found themselves, as well as a colleague who also works privately as a beekeeper, and the project was launched.
Der Anstoß für dieses Projekt kam 2017 von Maike Schäfer, damals Fraktionsvorsitzende Bündnis 90/Die Grünen und heutige Senatorin für Klimaschutz, Umwelt, Mobilität, Stadtentwicklung und Wohnungsbau. Bei einem Austausch mit unserem Management wurde unter anderem der Schutz der Bienen thematisiert. Daraufhin wurde die Sport- und Interessensgemeinschaft SIG gefragt, ob sie eine Sparte der Hobbyimker gründen könnten. Schnell hat sich eine Gruppe von Mitarbeiter*innen gefunden, sowie ein Kollege der auch privat als Imker tätig ist und das Projekt wurde ins Leben gerufen.
Why did you personally want to get involved in beekeeping?
Peter Wesling: I took care of the organization of the new division and originally didn’t want to become a hobby beekeeper. However, the topic fascinated me so much that I joined the group at short notice. Experiencing the life cycle of a bee and dealing with the effects and interactions of nature inspired me. I was able to expand my knowledge about insects incredibly.
Oliver Rahe: I’ve often considered having my own bee colony, but it also comes with a lot of obligations. A lot of time and high costs have to be invested in the equipment. These are also living beings that need to be taken care of. Here at the Steelshop, it was a welcome opportunity to get into the topic and see if it was an option for me personally. It showed me that I really enjoy it. In the future I will probably buy two of my own bee colonies, I have already completed the beekeeping course.
Peter Wesling: Ich habe mich um die Organisation der neuen Sparte gekümmert und wollte ursprünglich kein Hobbyimker werden. Die Thematik hat mich jedoch so fasziniert, dass ich mich kurzfristig der Gruppe angeschlossen hatte. Den Lebenszyklus einer Biene mitzuerleben und sich mit den Einwirkungen und Wechselwirkungen der Natur zu beschäftigen hat mich begeistert. Ich konnte mein Wissen über Insekten unglaublich erweitern.
Oliver Rahe: Ich habe oft überlegt, ein eigenes Bienenvolk zu haben, aber es gehen auch viele Verpflichtungen damit einher. Es muss viel Zeit und hohe Kosten für die Ausstattung investiert werden. Das sind auch Lebewesen, um die man sich kümmern muss. Hier auf der Hütte war es eine willkommene Gelegenheit in die Thematik reinzukommen und zu schauen, ob das für mich persönlich in Frage kommt. Es hat mir gezeigt, dass es mir enorm viel Spaß macht. In Zukunft werde ich mir voraussichtlich zwei eigene Bienenvölker anschaffen, den Imkerkurs habe ich bereits gemacht.
The project is part of the Sports and Interest Group – how has beekeeping contributed to the social aspect of working at ArcelorMittal Bremen? Has it brought people together?
The project has of course helped to bring people closer together. Many have noticed that there are bee colonies and hobby beekeepers. Many colleagues approached us and asked questions, for example, what to look out for in your garden to protect the bees. Many want to contribute. In addition, colleagues who had discovered a swarm of bees in a tree called us. Because of their attention we were able to save the bees.
Das Projekt hat natürlich dazu beigetragen Menschen einander näher zu bringen. Es haben viele mitbekommen, dass es die Bienenvölker und Hobbyimker gibt. Viele Kolleginnen sind auf uns zugekommen und haben Fragen gestellt z. B. worauf sie in ihrem Garten achten müssen, um die Bienen zu schützen. Viele wollen einen Beitrag leisten. Außerdem haben sich Kolleginnen gemeldet, die einen Bienenschwarm im Baum entdeckt hatten. Dank ihrer Aufmerksamkeit konnten wir die Bienen retten.
What were the aims of the group? How has beekeeping at ArcelorMittal Bremen grown since starting in 2017?
Unfortunately, we had a very changeable winter, which was not good for our bees. We lost a few colonies. But out of the mistakes we made in winter, we will grow for the future. In the period from 2017 to today, we also had to relocate the bees once. This involves a lot of effort since a new, suitable location had to be found that is at least 4 kilometers away from the old one. If this is not taken into account, the bees would no longer find their way and would fly to their old place.
We have also been able to harvest our own honey and give it out at events. However, the goal was never to harvest honey for sale, but to understand nature and make a small contribution against bee deaths.
Leider hatten wir einen sehr wechselhaften Winter, der unseren Bienen nicht gutgetan hat. Wir haben ein paar Völker verloren. Aus den Fehlern, die wir im Winter gemacht haben, wachsen wir aber für die Zukunft. In der Zeit von 2017 bis heute mussten wir die Bienen zudem einmal umsiedeln. Da ist mit besonderem Aufwand verbunden, da ein neuer geeigneter Standort gefunden werde muss, der mindestens 4 Kilometer vom alten entfernt liegt. Berücksichtigt man das nicht, würden sich die Bienen nicht mehr zurechtfinden und zu ihrem alten Platz fliegen.
Wir konnten zudem schon unseren eigenen Honig ernten und bei Veranstaltungen ausgeben. Es war aber nie das Ziel, Honig zum Verkauf zu ernten, sondern die Natur zu verstehen und einen kleinen Beitrag gegen das Bienensterben zu leisten.
How has ArcelorMittal had to adapt the premises to suit the needs of the bees and ensure they are well cared for?
We have a lot of green and partly flowering areas on our factory premises and therefore plenty of food for the bees. In 2021, we also expanded these areas and sowed flowering meadow seeds on around 2 hectares.
Wir haben auf unserem Werksgelände sehr viel grüne und zum Teil blühende Fläche und damit auch reichlich Futter für die Bienen. In 2021 haben wir diese Flächen auch noch erweitert und auf rund 2 Hektar Blühwiesensaat ausgesät.
Both ArcelorMittal Bremen and Bottrop have been involved in planting projects and have hosted clean-up days to ensure the surrounding environment is cared for, why is this so important?
Anyone who actively supports and helps to shape something respects their surroundings differently and ensures that the surroundings continue to be well cared for. In these areas, joint actions are designed that are important for the sense of togetherness.
Wer sich aktiv für etwas einsetzt und mitgestaltet, achtet seine Umgebung anders und sorgt dafür, dass die Umgebung auch weiterhin gut gepflegt wird. In den Bereichen werden gemeinsam Aktionen gestaltet, die wichtig für das Wir-Gefühl und das Miteinander sind.
ArcelorMittal Bremen was certified last year by ResponsibleSteel. What does it mean to you to be part of a certified site? What does responsibility look like to you?
We are very proud to be part of ResponsibleSteel. This is very important to us. We must all do something to reduce the use of resources and thus contribute to the sustainable protection of the environment.
Wir sind sehr stolz darauf, ein Teil von ResponsibleSteel zu sein. Das hat für uns einen sehr hohen Stellenwert. Wir müssen alle etwas dafür tun, um den Einsatz von Ressourcen und somit zur nachhaltigen Schonung der Umwelt beizutragen.
Peter Wesling is the Chairman of ArcelorMittal Bremen’s SIG. He trained as a mechanical engineering technician and later as a welding specialist. He has worked at the Bremen site for over thirty years. Since 2007, he has worked as the site’s service maintenance line manager.
Oliver Rahe started out as an industrial mechanic apprentice and has worked at the Bremen site for over twenty years. Over the last ten years, he has worked in the field of FDD3/VDD3 mechanics, personnel disposition in the area of VDV/PDV, and work preparation and processing at PDR.
June 2022 Newsletter
Please view our June 2022 newsletter by clicking the link below:
SteelZero: Driving the Collective Change for Net Zero Emissions
This is a crucial time for the steel sector and wider efforts to decarbonise heavy industry. With the G7 summit taking place in June, it’s vital that business leaders and policy decision-makers are equipped with the right information to drive the change needed.
So it’s timely and welcome that a new policy paper released by SteelZero – a global initiative led by international non-profit Climate Group in partnership with ResponsibleSteel – has set out steps governments must take to support the steel industry in its drive to achieve net zero emissions.
The policy position highlights six key principles to accelerate the net zero transition of the steel industry. If widely implemented, this will mobilise the systemic change that’s needed and support businesses in meeting their net zero steel targets by 2050. The paper calls on government decision-makers to:
- Promote a global standard and definition on what low emission and net zero steel is
- Support the public sector in using low emission and net zero steel in current and future projects
- Get businesses to measure and report on the carbon emissions associated with the steel they use
- Encourage better use of steel in the first place while ensuring that steel can be easily recycled
- Set expectations on what’s needed from steelmakers to drastically cut carbon emissions
- Create a level playing field for net zero steel in global markets
To read the full report, click here.
Meanwhile, further discussions at SteelZero’s Summit on May 31st will bring together leaders from across the global steel industry – and for the first time ever, centers on the demand side of the conversation.
ResponsibleSteel’s policy experts will be speaking at the event and calling for “steelmakers, downstream customers, and other organisations to join SteelZero and become part of this dynamic community for change.”
More on SteelZero:
SteelZero members make a public commitment to procure 100% net zero steel by 2050, with an interim commitment of using 50% responsibly produced steel by 2030.
By harnessing the collective purchasing power and influence of its members, SteelZero is shifting global markets and policies towards the responsible production and sourcing of steel.
For more details on SteelZero and becoming a member, click here.
